Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 16, 2020

Zhang v. Ken's Sushi Bistro Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:19-cv-02594
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zhang v. Ken’s Sushi Bistro, Judge Aaron required a filing explaining whether the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement was fair and reasonable.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, the defendants, and their attorneys were required to provide information about the proposed settlement, attorney fees, and the litigation by September 30, 2020.

What happened

In Zhang v. Ken’s Sushi Bistro, Inc. et al., the parties reached a settlement during a September 16, 2020, conference before the court. The case includes claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing matters such as minimum wages and overtime pay.

The court required the parties to submit a joint letter or motion addressing whether the settlement was fair and reasonable. The filing must discuss the claims and defenses, the possible value of the plaintiff’s claims, the defendants’ potential financial exposure, the settlement negotiations, and other relevant considerations.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron also required information about attorney fees, the fee agreement, hours worked, attorney experience, and a copy of the settlement agreement. The filing was due by September 30, 2020; the opinion did not approve or reject the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zhang v. Ken's Sushi Bistro Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-02594
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Sept. 16, 2020

Background

The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties reached a settlement during a settlement conference held before Judge Aaron on September 16, 2020.

Court’s Order

The court cited Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a Second Circuit decision requiring judicial review of certain Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The court required the parties to file a joint letter or motion addressing whether their settlement was fair and reasonable.

The filing had to address:

- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case and the defendants’ defenses; - reasons for any difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and negotiation process; and - other issues relevant to whether the settlement was reasonable, including whether a judgment would be collectible if the case went to trial.

The court also required an explanation of the attorney-fee arrangement, a copy of the retainer agreement, information about the attorneys’ hours worked and relevant experience, and a copy of the settlement agreement. The joint letter or motion was due by September 30, 2020.

Disposition

The order required the parties to provide information for the court’s fairness review. It did not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement. Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered the order on September 16, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.