Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 16, 2020

Candelario v. ABC Corp.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:19-cv-07732
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Candelario v. ABC Corp., Judge Aaron approved a fair settlement of Fair Labor Standards Act claims and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The settlement approval and dismissal affect Teofilo Humberto Candelario and the defendants, including ABC Corp., d/b/a La Caridad, and the other defendants named in the action.

What happened

Teofilo Humberto Candelario brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act against ABC Corp., doing business as La Caridad, and other defendants. The parties reached a settlement in principle at a settlement conference.

The parties submitted their proposed settlement agreement and related papers to the court. After reviewing them, the court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as stated in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Candelario v. ABC Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-07732
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Oct. 16, 2020

Background

The action included claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties appeared before Judge Stewart D. Aaron for a settlement conference on August 31, 2020, and reached a settlement in principle.

Settlement Review

On October 14, 2020, the parties submitted their proposed settlement agreement and related papers. The court reviewed the proposed settlement and found it fair and reasonable, citing Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

Ruling and Disposition

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as stated in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, and the Clerk was requested to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.