Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 26, 2021

Ramos v. Eddy

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:21-cv-01649
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ramos v. Eddy, Judge Furman ordered defendants to amend their removal notice or face remand for failing to show complete diversity.

Who this affects

Frank Ramos, Kyle Wayne Eddy, and VR Kendall Trucking LLC. Defendants had to provide additional information about VR Kendall’s citizenship, or the case would be remanded to New York state court.

What happened

In Ramos v. Eddy, defendants Kyle Wayne Eddy and VR Kendall Trucking LLC removed Frank Ramos’s case from New York state court to federal court, claiming that the parties were citizens of different states. The removal notice identified Ramos as a New York citizen and the defendants as Pennsylvania citizens.

The court explained that an LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of each member. If VR Kendall were a limited partnership, its citizenship would depend on the citizenship of each general and limited partner. The removal notice did not provide that information.

The court ordered defendants to amend the removal notice by March 12, 2021, to identify the citizenship of each person or entity making up VR Kendall, including specified corporate information for any corporate member or partner. Judge Jesse M. Furman stated that the case would be sent back to the Bronx County Supreme Court if defendants could not truthfully show complete diversity. The court also ordered service of the order and directed Ramos’s lawyer to file a notice of appearance.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ramos v. Eddy · No. 1:21-cv-01649
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
Feb. 26, 2021

Background

Defendants Kyle Wayne Eddy and VR Kendall Trucking LLC removed the action from the Supreme Court of New York, Bronx County. They asserted that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the notice identified Ramos as a New York citizen and both defendants as Pennsylvania citizens.

Jurisdictional problem

For diversity jurisdiction, an LLC is treated as a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A limited partnership is treated as a citizen of every state where its general and limited partners are citizens. The court therefore required the removal notice to identify the citizenship of each person or entity comprising VR Kendall. For any corporate member or partner, the notice also had to state the entity’s state of incorporation and principal place of business.

The complaint described VR Kendall as a limited liability partnership, while the answer denied that allegation. The court stated that VR Kendall appeared from its name to be an LLC, but explained that the same need to identify constituent citizenship applied if it were a limited partnership. The notice of removal did not supply the required information.

Order

The court ordered defendants to amend their notice of removal by March 12, 2021, to allege the citizenship of each constituent person or entity comprising VR Kendall as an LLC or limited partnership. If defendants could not truthfully allege complete diversity by that date, the court ordered that the action would be remanded to the Supreme Court of New York, Bronx County, without further notice.

The court also directed defendants to serve Ramos with the order within two business days and file proof of service. Ramos’s counsel was directed to file a notice of appearance within two business days after service. The order did not itself state that the case was remanded.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.