Seliger v. Oath, Inc.
- Denise Cote
- 1:20-cv-02966
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Seliger v. Oath, Judge Cote discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration by April 19, 2021, or dismissal with prejudice thereafter.
Mark Seliger, Oath, Inc. doing business as “HuffPost,” and the other defendants identified as Does 1–10; the case was discontinued following a reported settlement.
What happened
Seliger v. Oath, Inc. involved Mark Seliger’s case against Oath, Inc., doing business as HuffPost, and other named defendants.
The court was informed that the case had been settled. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.
Judge Denise Cote discontinued the case without costs. The case could be restored if an application was made by April 19, 2021; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Seliger v. Oath, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-02966
- Denise Cote
- Mar. 18, 2021
Background
Mark Seliger sued Oath, Inc., identified as a Delaware corporation and doing business as “HuffPost,” along with Does 1–10. The court was informed that the case had been settled. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or the claims involved.
Ruling
Judge Denise Cote ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by April 19, 2021. The order further states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.