Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 4, 2021

Vargas v. United States

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:16-cv-05044
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasSentencingCriminal
In one sentence

In Vargas v. United States, Judge Caproni ordered Vargas to explain why his sentence petition should not be withdrawn or summarily dismissed.

Who this affects

Nelson Vargas’s pending sentence challenge; the United States may be affected if a response is necessary.

What happened

Nelson Vargas filed a petition under Section 2255 asking the court to overturn his 1991 sentence. He argued that the mandatory career-offender sentencing guideline used an unconstitutional definition of a “crime of violence.”

The Second Circuit later held in a related case that similar petitions were filed too late, even when filed within one year of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States. Vargas was released from prison on December 8, 2020, but the opinion does not say that his petition was withdrawn or dismissed.

On May 4, 2021, Judge Valerie Caproni ordered Vargas to file a letter by May 14 explaining why his petition should not be withdrawn or summarily dismissed. The United States may respond by May 28 if necessary.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vargas v. United States · No. 1:16-cv-05044
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
May 4, 2021

Background

Nelson Vargas filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a procedure allowing a federal prisoner to challenge a sentence. He argued that his 1991 sentence should be overturned because the mandatory career-offender sentencing guideline contained an unconstitutionally vague “residual clause” defining a crime of violence. The petition was filed within one year after the Supreme Court held that an identical residual clause in a federal statute was unconstitutionally vague in Johnson v. United States.

Effect of the Second Circuit’s Decision

The Second Circuit later held in a related proceeding that a petition challenging a sentence imposed under the mandatory sentencing guidelines based on Johnson was untimely, even when filed within one year of Johnson. After the Supreme Court declined to review that decision, the court instructed Vargas to address whether his petition should be withdrawn or summarily dismissed. The opinion also states that Vargas was released from incarceration on December 8, 2020.

Order

The court did not itself withdraw or dismiss Vargas’s petition in this order. Judge Valerie Caproni ordered Vargas to file a letter no later than May 14, 2021, explaining whether there was any reason his petition should not be withdrawn or summarily dismissed in light of the Second Circuit’s decision. The United States must file a response by May 28, 2021, if necessary.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.