Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 14, 2021

Almonte v. Washington Heights Wireless, Inc.

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:20-cv-08848
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Almonte v. Washington Heights Wireless, Inc., Judge Aaron approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and Washington Heights Wireless, Inc. and the other defendants were affected by approval of their settlement and dismissal of the action with prejudice. The settlement’s terms are not stated in the opinion.

What happened

In Almonte v. Washington Heights Wireless, Inc., the plaintiffs brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement for the court’s review.

The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and approved it. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained authority to enforce the settlement and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Almonte v. Washington Heights Wireless, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-08848
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
May 14, 2021

Background

The plaintiffs asserted claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On May 7, 2021, the parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement. On May 11, 2021, the case was referred to Judge Stewart D. Aaron, with the parties’ consent, to decide the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Court’s Analysis

After reviewing the proposed settlement, the court found that it was fair and reasonable. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, except as stated in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction, meaning continuing authority, to enforce the settlement agreement and requested that the Clerk close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.