Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Carlito's…
Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund v. Carlito's Contracting Corp.
- Victor Marrero
- 1:20-cv-05210
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Carlito's Contracting Corp.: Judge Marrero confirmed the arbitration award for $11,493.83 plus interest.
The petitioners—the trustees for the Mason Tenders funds and the Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York—obtained confirmation of an arbitration award against Carlito's Contracting Corp. for $11,493.83 plus post-judgment interest. The petitioners did not receive attorneys' fees and costs for bringing the petition.
What happened
In Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund, Annuity Fund, and Training Program Fund v. Carlito's Contracting Corp., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. Carlito's Contracting Corp. did not oppose the petition.
The court treated the unopposed petition as a request for summary judgment. It found that the arbitrator acted within the authority given by the parties' agreement and confirmed the award for $11,493.83, plus post-judgment interest. The court did not award the petitioners attorneys' fees and costs because they did not provide time records or other supporting materials.
Judge Victor Marrero granted the petition and directed the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Carlito's… · No. 1:20-cv-05210
- Victor Marrero
- Aug. 16, 2021
Background
The trustees for several Mason Tenders funds and the Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York petitioned the court to confirm an arbitration award against Carlito's Contracting Corp. The petition was unopposed.
Court's analysis
The court treated the unopposed petition as a motion for summary judgment. It explained that courts generally must confirm an arbitration award when the arbitrator acted within the scope of the arbitrator's authority and the award was based on the parties' agreement. The court reviewed the petition and supporting documents and found that the arbitrator had acted within that authority.
The court also found that post-judgment interest was warranted. It declined to award attorneys' fees and costs for the petition because the petitioners had not supported that request with time records or other documentation.
Ruling
Judge Victor Marrero granted the petition. The order confirmed the arbitration award in the amount of $11,493.83 plus post-judgment interest. The court did not award attorneys' fees and costs, directed the clerk to dismiss all pending motions, and ordered the case closed.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Mar 2022
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Oct 2021
- Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and…Aug 2021
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Aug 2021
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Apr 2021
- Trustees ofv. AMG