Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Kaja Custom Builders LLC
- Victor Marrero
- 1:22-cv-00171
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
Judge Marrero granted Trustees v. Kaja Custom Builders LLC’s unopposed petition, confirming the arbitration award and awarding interest, fees, and costs.
The four petitioners received a court judgment confirming the arbitration award, awarding them $124,019.01 plus pre-judgment interest at 5.25% per year, statutory post-judgment interest, $1,432.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $77 in costs. Kaja Custom Builders LLC is subject to that judgment.
What happened
In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al. v. Kaja Custom Builders LLC, the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. Kaja did not oppose the petition.
The court treated the unopposed petition as a request for summary judgment and found that the arbitrators acted within their authority. It also found that post-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees were warranted.
Judge Victor Marrero granted the petition. The judgment awarded the petitioners $124,019.01 plus 5.25% annual interest from March 8, 2021, statutory post-judgment interest, $1,432.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $77 in costs.
The detailed version
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:22-cv-00171
- Victor Marrero
- Mar. 31, 2022
Background
Four petitioners—the listed trustees and carpenter organizations—brought a petition against Kaja Custom Builders LLC to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was unopposed.
Court’s reasoning
The court explained that an arbitration award generally must be confirmed if the arbitrator acted within the scope of the arbitrator’s authority and the award was based on the parties’ agreement. The court treated the unopposed petition as a motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the petition, supporting memorandum, and accompanying documents, the court found that the arbitrators acted within their authority and confirmed the award.
The court also found that post-judgment interest was warranted and that the petitioners’ request for attorneys’ fees was proper based on their representations that Kaja had refused to comply with the award. The petitioners submitted records showing $1,432.50 in attorneys’ fees and $77 in costs.
Disposition
The court granted the petition. It ordered judgment awarding the petitioners $124,019.01, plus interest from March 8, 2021—the date of the arbitration award—through the date of judgment at 5.25% per year. It also awarded statutory post-judgment interest, $1,432.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $77 in costs.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and…Aug 2021
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Aug 2021
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Oct 2021
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Aug 2021
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Apr 2021
- Trustees ofv. AMG