Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Aug. 16, 2021

Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and…

Full caption

Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund and District Council No. 9 International Union of Pain v. Drywall & Acoustics of N.E. Inc.

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:21-cv-05632
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Drywall & Acoustics, Judge Marrero confirmed a $7,760.02 arbitration award.

Who this affects

The ruling affects the petitioners—the Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund, the Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund, and the District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades—and Drywall & Acoustics of N.E. Inc. The petitioners obtained a court judgment confirming the $7,760.02 arbitration award, plus post-judgment interest.

What happened

In Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund v. Drywall & Acoustics of N.E. Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was unopposed.

The court treated the petition as an unopposed request for summary judgment and found that the arbitrators acted within their authority. It also found that post-judgment interest was warranted and that the petitioners’ request for attorneys’ fees was proper in principle, based on their representation that Drywall had refused to comply with the award.

Judge Victor Marrero granted the petition for $7,760.02 plus post-judgment interest. He directed the petitioners to submit records supporting any request for attorneys’ fees and costs, or to tell the court they would give up that request.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and… · No. 1:21-cv-05632
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Aug. 16, 2021

Background

The petitioners sought confirmation of an arbitration award against Drywall & Acoustics of N.E. Inc., also identified in the opinion as Drywall & Acoustics of Northeast Inc. The petition was unopposed. The petitioners also sought post-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees and costs.

Legal standard and analysis

The court explained that an arbitration award generally must be confirmed if the arbitrator acted within the scope of the arbitrator’s authority and the award arose from the parties’ agreement. A court should not overturn an award merely because it believes the arbitrator made a serious mistake. Confirmation is generally a summary proceeding that turns the existing arbitration award into a court judgment.

Because the petition was unopposed, the court treated it as an unopposed motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment when the relevant materials show that no trial is needed. After reviewing the petition, legal memorandum, and supporting documents, the court found that the arbitrators acted within the scope of their authority and confirmed the award. The court also found that post-judgment interest was warranted. It found the request for attorneys’ fees proper based on the petitioners’ representation that Drywall had refused to comply with the award, but noted that the petitioners had not provided time records or other supporting materials for the requested fees and costs.

Disposition

The court granted the petition to confirm the arbitration award in the amount of $7,760.02, with post-judgment interest. The court directed the petitioners to submit a supported request for attorneys’ fees and costs, including records showing the reasonableness of the proposed award, or to inform the court that they intended to forego those fees and costs. The opinion does not state a specific amount of attorneys’ fees or costs awarded.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.