Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 28, 2021

Cobb v. APWU NY Metro Union

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:21-cv-06446
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureEmploymentPro Se
In one sentence

In Cobb v. APWU NY Metro Union, Judge Woods ordered service of Cobb’s discrimination and retaliation complaint through the U.S. Marshals Service.

Who this affects

The order affects Kenya Cobb, the United States Postal Service, the named individual defendants, APWU NY Metro Union, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service by arranging service of the lawsuit and addressing the filing-fee status for an appeal.

What happened

In Cobb v. APWU NY Metro Union, Kenya Cobb brought a lawsuit without a lawyer alleging that her employer discriminated and retaliated against her under the Rehabilitation Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The court had already allowed her to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court ordered the Clerk to issue summonses and prepare service forms for the United States Postal Service, the individual defendants, and APWU NY Metro Union. The U.S. Marshals Service was directed to serve them, and the time for service was extended to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Gregory H. Woods ordered the service-related steps and directed that a copy of the order and an information package be mailed to Cobb. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order, certifying that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cobb v. APWU NY Metro Union · No. 1:21-cv-06446
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Sept. 28, 2021

Background

Kenya Cobb filed this action without a lawyer against the United States Postal Service, Nair Reghuvaran, D. Beete, Rolando Pasaq, Carol Cook, M. Felix, M. Burns, and APWU NY Metro Union. She alleged employment discrimination and retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Although Cobb identified the Americans with Disabilities Act as a basis for the action, the court explained that federal employees cannot bring employment-discrimination claims against a federal employer under that statute; the disability-discrimination claims were therefore treated as claims under the Rehabilitation Act.

The court had previously granted Cobb permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. Because she was proceeding without paying the filing fee, the court explained that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The usual 90-day service period was extended until 90 days after the summonses are issued because Cobb could not have served the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued.

Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, mark the forms for service on the United States where required, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The court directed service on the United States Postal Service; Nair Reghuvaran; D. Beete (Law Department); Rolando Pasaq (Nurse); Carol Cook (Acting Finance Supervisor); M. Felix (Station Manager); M. Burns (Parcel Supervisor); and APWU NY Metro Union.

The court stated that Cobb must notify it in writing if her address changes and that the action could be dismissed if she fails to do so. It also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. Judge Gregory H. Woods ordered the Clerk to mail Cobb a copy of the order and an information package.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.