Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE v. M/V Maersk Idaho
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:21-cv-08931
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Allianz v. M/V Maersk Idaho, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, without costs, while allowing limited reopening requests.
The parties to the case, including Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE, M/V Maersk Idaho, Maersk A/S doing business as Maersk Line, and Kuehne + Nagel Inc. doing business as Blue Anchor America Line.
What happened
Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE and the other parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues in Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE v. M/V Maersk Idaho.
The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs or attorneys’ fees to either party, terminated open motions, and closed the case.
Judge Caproni allowed the parties 30 days to seek reopening for good cause or to ask the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement, subject to specified filing requirements.
The detailed version
- Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty SE v. M/V Maersk Idaho · No. 1:21-cv-08931
- Valerie Caproni
- Feb. 7, 2022
Background
On February 4, 2022, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the agreement’s terms.
Court’s Order
The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.
The order allows the parties to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Any such application must show good cause for keeping the case open despite the parties’ settlement. A request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied on that basis alone.
The parties may also ask the court to retain jurisdiction—the court’s authority to enforce the settlement agreement. To do so, they must submit the settlement agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction, both within the same 30-day period.
Disposition
The case was dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party, and the court ordered the case closed. The order did not decide the underlying dispute on its merits.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.