Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 11, 2022

Anderson v. Schneider National Inc.

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:22-cv-01689
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
EmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Anderson v. Schneider National Inc., Judge Halpern ordered Marshals service for Anderson’s Title VII and state-law gender-discrimination claims.

Who this affects

Alishia Anderson, Schneider National Inc., Scott Tomick, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Anderson v. Schneider National Inc., Alishia Anderson, representing herself, alleges that Schneider National Inc. and Scott Tomick discriminated against her because of her gender. The court also treated her allegations as asserting a claim under New York’s Human Rights Law.

The court had allowed Anderson to proceed without paying filing fees. Because she was proceeding that way, the court said the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service would handle service of the lawsuit. The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses are issued.

Judge Philip M. Halpern ordered the Clerk to issue summonses, complete the service forms, and give the necessary documents to the Marshals Service for service on Schneider National Inc. and Scott Tomick. The order did not decide whether Anderson’s discrimination claims have merit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Anderson v. Schneider National Inc. · No. 7:22-cv-01689
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Mar. 11, 2022

Background

Alishia Anderson brought this self-represented action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that her employer discriminated against her based on gender. The court construed the complaint as also asserting a claim under the New York State Human Rights Law because her factual allegations supported that state-law claim.

The court had granted Anderson permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees, commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis. Defendants are Schneider National Inc. and Scott Tomick, identified in the caption as a Driver Business Leader.

Service ruling

Because Anderson was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court stated that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the time for service until 90 days after summonses are issued. It stated that, if service is not completed within that period, Anderson should request an extension of time.

The court directed the Clerk to issue summonses for Schneider National Inc. and Scott Tomick, complete the U.S. Marshals Service process forms using the defendants’ listed addresses, and deliver the required documents to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Anderson a copy of the order and an information package.

Effect of the order

This was an order arranging service of the complaint. The opinion did not resolve the Title VII or New York State Human Rights Law claims and did not determine whether the alleged discrimination occurred. Anderson was also instructed to notify the court in writing if her address changes.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.