Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 21, 2022

Velasquez v. Kiner's Corner LLC

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:18-cv-10969
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionDiscovery
In one sentence

In Velasquez v. Kiner's Corner LLC, Judge McMahon awarded $8,260.06 for fees and expenses related to a failed deposition.

Who this affects

Ricardo Velasquez received an award of $8,260.06 in attorney fees and expenses; the defendants were ordered to pay the awarded amount through the judgment.

What happened

In Velasquez v. Kiner's Corner LLC, the court had previously granted Ricardo Velasquez's request for sanctions and directed him to submit fees and expenses connected to a failed deposition and later requests to compel discovery. His lawyer requested $10,272.56, including attorney time, deposition-reporting costs, and transcription costs.

The defendants opposed the request, arguing that the lawyer's $575 hourly rate was unreasonable. The court found reasonable 14 hours spent preparing for and taking the deposition and preparing the requests to compel, along with $210.06 in deposition-related expenses. It excluded 3.5 hours spent on tasks after the earlier sanctions order because those tasks were not sufficiently connected to the deposition and discovery motions.

Judge McMahon awarded Velasquez $8,260.06 in attorney fees and expenses and directed the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Velasquez v. Kiner's Corner LLC · No. 1:18-cv-10969
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Mar. 21, 2022

Background

The court had earlier granted Ricardo Velasquez's motion for sanctions and ordered him to file an affidavit listing fees and expenses associated with a failed deposition and later motions to compel. Velasquez's counsel submitted an affidavit requesting $10,272.56.

The request included 14 hours of attorney work for deposition preparation, taking the deposition, and preparing the motion to compel and reply papers, billed at $575 per hour. It also included $210.06 for deposition-reporter and transcription costs. Counsel additionally requested payment for 3.5 hours spent reviewing the earlier sanctions order, communicating about rescheduling the deposition of George Papadopoulos, and preparing the fee affidavit.

The defendants opposed the request and argued that the fees and expenses were unreasonable, including that counsel had not shown that a $575 hourly rate was justified.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that calculating reasonable attorney fees is a factual matter within the district court's discretion. It used the standard of multiplying the reasonable hours worked by a reasonable hourly rate.

The court found that the 14 hours billed at $575 per hour were appropriate and reasonable in connection with the failed deposition and the later motions to compel. It also found the $210.06 in deposition-reporting and transcription expenses reasonable.

The court excluded the additional 3.5 hours. It concluded that those hours were spent on tasks after the February 22, 2022 sanctions order and were not reasonably connected to the deposition and motions to compel for which sanctions had been awarded.

Disposition

Judge McMahon awarded Velasquez $8,260.06 in attorney fees and expenses. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment accordingly. This was an ancillary fee award rather than a decision on the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.