Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 29, 2022

Saccani Distributing Co. v. Clean Cause, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:21-cv-07942
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Saccani Distributing v. Clean Cause, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Saccani Distributing Co. and Clean Cause, Inc.; the case was closed after the parties reached a settlement.

What happened

Saccani Distributing Co. v. Clean Cause, Inc. was reported to the court as settled through court-ordered mediation on June 29, 2022.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, terminated all open motions, and closed the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties to seek reopening within 30 days for good cause and explained how they could ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Saccani Distributing Co. v. Clean Cause, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-07942
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
June 29, 2022

Background

The court was notified that Saccani Distributing Co. and Clean Cause, Inc. had reached a settlement through court-ordered mediation. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties were permitted to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Any such application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement. The order states that a request filed after 30 days, or filed without a showing of good cause, could be denied on that basis alone.

The court also explained that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce the settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and a request for an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, and closed the case, subject to the stated 30-day procedures for reopening the case or requesting retained authority to enforce the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.