Calcano v. National Amusements, Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:19-cv-11428
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Calcano v. National Amusements, Judge Abrams allowed Calcano to file an amended complaint after a Second Circuit standing decision.
Evelina Calcano and National Amusements, Inc.; the order set deadlines for an amended complaint and the defendant’s response.
What happened
In Evelina Calcano v. National Amusements, Inc., Calcano asked to amend her complaint after the Second Circuit ruled in related appeals that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue. The dispute concerns whether companies must provide Braille-embossed gift cards.
Calcano argued that an amended complaint could add facts supporting standing and that the case could succeed on its merits. National Amusements opposed another amendment, arguing that it was delayed and would be futile because of the Second Circuit’s decision, and asked the court to resolve or supplement its motion to dismiss.
Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered Calcano to file an amended complaint by August 29, 2022, if she had a good-faith basis to do so. The defendant then had two weeks to answer or file a motion to dismiss; the order did not decide the merits of the claims.
The detailed version
- Calcano v. National Amusements, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-11428
- Ronnie Abrams
- July 28, 2022
Background
The case concerns claims involving Braille-embossed gift cards and protections under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The parties had previously placed the case on hold while the Second Circuit considered related appeals involving similar legal issues. In those appeals, the Second Circuit’s majority concluded that the plaintiffs lacked standing under Article III of the Constitution. The opinion text states that the majority did not reach the merits beyond standing.
Calcano asked for permission to file another amended complaint within 30 days. She argued that the amendment would add factual allegations addressing the standing requirements identified by the Second Circuit. She also argued that gift cards are not merely goods but can constitute a service protected by Title III.
National Amusements opposed another amendment. It argued that Calcano had waited about two years after requesting the stay, that the delay prejudiced the defense, and that any amendment would be futile because of the Second Circuit’s decision. National Amusements asked the court to resolve its stayed motion to dismiss, allow it to supplement that motion, or dismiss the case.
Ruling
Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered that Calcano “shall file an amended complaint by August 29, 2022,” to the extent she had a good-faith basis to do so. Two weeks after the amended complaint was filed, National Amusements was required to file either an answer or a motion to dismiss. The order also permitted National Amusements to repeat the arguments from its earlier motion to dismiss for efficiency. The supplied text does not state that the court granted or denied the motion to dismiss, and it does not contain a merits ruling on the claims.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.