Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 28, 2022

Altagracia v. 1470 Estrella Bar & Restaurant Corp.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:21-cv-10213
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mario Altagracia v. Martha Collado, Judge Netburn approved the parties’ proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement as fair and reasonable.

Who this affects

Mario Altagracia, Martha Collado, and the other parties to the settlement.

What happened

In Mario Altagracia v. Martha Collado, et al., the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law.

The parties submitted their proposed settlement for the court’s review. After reviewing it, the court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable and approved it.

Judge Sarah Netburn ordered the parties to file a dismissal agreement stating that the case would be dismissed with prejudice, or to explain why the case had not been dismissed, by September 15, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Altagracia v. 1470 Estrella Bar & Restaurant Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-10213
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
July 28, 2022

Background

This was a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted a proposed settlement on July 27, 2022, for the court’s review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House. That review is required for certain wage-and-hour settlements.

Ruling

After reviewing the proposed settlement, the court determined that it was fair and reasonable. The court approved the settlement.

The court ordered the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, meaning a dismissal that bars refiling the same case, or to report why the case had not been dismissed by September 15, 2022. The order did not state the settlement’s terms or amount.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.