Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 4, 2022

Abikzer v. 110 Gifts LLC

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:22-cv-01680
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Abikzer v. 110 Gifts LLC, Judge Aaron approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Abraham Abikzer and the defendants in the action, including 110 Gifts LLC; the settlement also affected the parties’ attorneys’ fees and enforcement rights.

What happened

In Abikzer v. 110 Gifts LLC, the parties settled all issues after mediation in a lawsuit involving claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable, considering the plaintiff’s individual claims and the risks and costs of continuing the litigation. It also approved $8,019 in attorney’s fees and costs.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the settlement, dismissed the action with prejudice, retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abikzer v. 110 Gifts LLC · No. 1:22-cv-01680
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
Nov. 4, 2022

Background

The case included claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. After mediation, the parties reached a settlement covering all issues. They submitted the proposed settlement agreement and a letter explaining why the agreement—including attorney’s fees and costs—was fair, reasonable, and adequate.

The matter had been referred to Judge Stewart D. Aaron for disposition with the parties’ consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement and found it fair and reasonable in light of the nature and scope of Abraham Abikzer’s individual claims and the risks and expenses of additional litigation.

Abikzer also requested approval of $8,019 in attorney’s fees and costs, described as one-third of the total settlement amount plus costs. The court noted that courts in the judicial circuit commonly approve fees equal to one-third of the total recovery. It found the requested fees fair and reasonable but expressly made no findings about whether counsel’s hourly rates were reasonable.

Ruling

The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.