Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 18, 2022

PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:19-cv-07577
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In PharmacyChecker.com v. National Association, Judge Karas granted both parties’ conditional-sealing motions and set a deadline for permanent sealing.

Who this affects

PharmacyChecker.com LLC and the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, whose referenced materials were conditionally sealed; PharmacyChecker.com also received a deadline to seek permanent sealing.

What happened

PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy concerned requests to keep certain confidential information temporarily under seal. The information appeared in materials connected to a planned motion concerning an amended counterclaim.

PharmacyChecker.com and the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy each asked to conditionally seal referenced materials under a protective order. The court granted both requests.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas also ordered that PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal the materials was due by December 2, 2022, and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motions listed at Docket Nos. 313 and 318.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy · No. 7:19-cv-07577
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Nov. 18, 2022

Background

PharmacyChecker.com LLC asked to conditionally seal confidential information in its pre-motion letter concerning a planned motion to dismiss the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy’s amended counterclaim. The letter said the information was covered by the parties’ stipulated protective order and included material that PharmacyChecker.com had designated confidential or for outside counsel’s eyes only.

The opinion also refers to a conditional-sealing request by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. The court noted that judicial documents generally carry a presumption of public access, but that presumption is not absolute. It identified the relevant considerations as whether the material is a judicial document, the strength of the public-access presumption, and whether competing interests outweigh that presumption.

Ruling

The court granted PharmacyChecker.com’s letter motion to conditionally seal the referenced material in Docket No. 320. It also granted the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy’s letter motion to conditionally seal the referenced material in Docket No. 314. The court ordered that PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal the conditionally sealed materials was due by December 2, 2022, and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motions at Docket Nos. 313 and 318.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.