PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:19-cv-07577
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In PharmacyChecker.com v. National Association, Judge Karas granted both parties’ conditional-sealing motions and set a deadline for permanent sealing.
PharmacyChecker.com LLC and the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, whose referenced materials were conditionally sealed; PharmacyChecker.com also received a deadline to seek permanent sealing.
What happened
PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy concerned requests to keep certain confidential information temporarily under seal. The information appeared in materials connected to a planned motion concerning an amended counterclaim.
PharmacyChecker.com and the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy each asked to conditionally seal referenced materials under a protective order. The court granted both requests.
Judge Kenneth M. Karas also ordered that PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal the materials was due by December 2, 2022, and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motions listed at Docket Nos. 313 and 318.
The detailed version
- PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy · No. 7:19-cv-07577
- Kenneth Karas
- Nov. 18, 2022
Background
PharmacyChecker.com LLC asked to conditionally seal confidential information in its pre-motion letter concerning a planned motion to dismiss the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy’s amended counterclaim. The letter said the information was covered by the parties’ stipulated protective order and included material that PharmacyChecker.com had designated confidential or for outside counsel’s eyes only.
The opinion also refers to a conditional-sealing request by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. The court noted that judicial documents generally carry a presumption of public access, but that presumption is not absolute. It identified the relevant considerations as whether the material is a judicial document, the strength of the public-access presumption, and whether competing interests outweigh that presumption.
Ruling
The court granted PharmacyChecker.com’s letter motion to conditionally seal the referenced material in Docket No. 320. It also granted the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy’s letter motion to conditionally seal the referenced material in Docket No. 314. The court ordered that PharmacyChecker.com’s motion to permanently seal the conditionally sealed materials was due by December 2, 2022, and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motions at Docket Nos. 313 and 318.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.