Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 6, 2023

Nicholas v. Seggos

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-02455
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Nicholas v. Seggos, Judge Swain transferred the pro se license case to Northern New York, leaving fee and injunction decisions to that court.

Who this affects

JB Nicholas’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of New York. The transferee court, rather than this court, will decide his request to proceed without prepaying fees and his preliminary-injunction motion.

What happened

JB Nicholas sued Basil Seggos and Gaye Somogie under a federal civil-rights law, claiming that New York’s environmental agency refused to process his outdoor guide license application. He also asked for an order temporarily requiring action while the case continued.

Judge Swain found that the complaint did not show that the events occurred in the Southern District of New York or that the defendants lived there. Nicholas lived in Franklin County, and the agency’s principal office was in Albany, which supported Northern District of New York as a more convenient location.

Judge Swain transferred the action to the Northern District of New York. That court will decide whether Nicholas may proceed without paying filing fees and whether to grant his requested preliminary injunction; this court did not decide those issues or the underlying license claim.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nicholas v. Seggos · No. 1:23-cv-02455
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 6, 2023

Background

JB Nicholas, appearing without a lawyer, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing certain claims against state officials for violating federal rights. He alleged that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation refused to process his application for an outdoor guide license. He named Basil Seggos, the agency’s Commissioner, and Gaye Somogie, its Licensed Guide Program Coordinator, as defendants. Nicholas also moved for a preliminary injunction, which is a temporary court order intended to preserve a position or prevent harm while a case is pending.

Venue analysis

The court explained that federal law generally permits a civil action to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Nicholas alleged that he resided in Malone, New York, but did not identify where the defendants resided or where the events giving rise to his claims occurred. The court therefore found it unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York.

The court noted that Nicholas’s residence was in Franklin County, within the Northern District of New York. It also stated that the defendants worked for an agency whose principal office was in Albany, New York, and that the defendants could therefore be considered to reside in the Northern District for venue purposes. Even if venue were proper in the Southern District, the court concluded under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) that transfer was appropriate for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The complaint did not suggest that any relevant events occurred in the Southern District, while the Northern District was where Nicholas resided and where the agency’s principal office was located.

Ruling

The court directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. It left to the transferee court the decisions about whether Nicholas could proceed without prepaying filing fees and whether to grant a preliminary injunction. Summonses were not to issue from the Southern District, and the order closed the action in that court. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not decide the merits of Nicholas’s license-related claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.