Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 20, 2023

Leggett v. Ontada

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-03743
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
18
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Leggett v. Ontada, Judge Swain dismissed all claims against the named defendants but allowed Corey Leggett 60 days to amend.

Who this affects

Corey Leggett and the named defendants. Leggett’s claims against the named defendants were dismissed, but he was given 60 days to file an amended complaint. The order also denied fee-free status for an appeal.

What happened

In Leggett v. Ontada, Corey Leggett, representing himself, alleged that events during his incarceration caused medical and mental-health harms. He sought records, property, and money damages.

The court found that the complaint did not explain how the individual defendants personally participated in the alleged violations. It also ruled that several correctional and police units could not be sued, and identified possible time limits affecting claims based on incarceration at Sing Sing Correctional Facility.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed all claims against the named defendants but granted Leggett 60 days to file an amended complaint with more specific facts and defendants. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Leggett v. Ontada · No. 1:23-cv-03743
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 20, 2023

Background

Corey Leggett filed the action while representing himself and was previously allowed to proceed without paying filing fees up front. He invoked federal-question and diversity jurisdiction. He alleged that events connected to his incarceration occurred in September 2001, including alleged probing, dehydration before blood work, and attempts to affect his brainwaves. He also stated that he had been admitted to psychiatric institutions, alleged migraine headaches, and requested mental-health and medical records, property, and money damages.

The court understood the complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a statute that allows a person to seek relief for violations of federal rights by someone acting under state authority. The court said that Leggett did not allege facts showing the personal involvement of Ms. Buchannan, Monica Bell, Deputy Hurley, or Lester M. Wright. It therefore dismissed the claims against those defendants for failure to state a claim.

Reasons for Dismissal

The court held that the Marcy Correctional Facility psychiatric unit was part of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, an arm of the state protected by the Eleventh Amendment, and was not a proper “person” to sue under Section 1983 for the monetary relief sought.

The court also dismissed the claims against the Portchester Police Department and Rockland “Cyc Unit” because they were municipal agencies or departments that could not be sued as separate entities under New York law. It likewise dismissed the claims against the Bronx “Cyc Unit” and Kings Borough “Cyc Center” because municipal agencies of New York City generally cannot be sued separately from the city. The court declined to add the City of Portchester, Rockland County, or the City of New York because the complaint did not allege facts showing their involvement in violating Leggett’s rights.

The court further explained that Section 1983 claims in New York generally must be filed within three years after they arise. Because the complaint was filed on May 3, 2023, the court concluded that any claims arising at Sing Sing Correctional Facility after Leggett’s release in December 2019 were time barred. The court found no facts supporting tolling of that deadline but allowed Leggett to include facts about possible tolling in an amended complaint.

Order

The court dismissed all claims against Ms. Buchanan, Monica Ball, Deputy Hurley, Lester M. Wright, the Portchester Police Department, Marcy Corr. Cyc Unit, Rockland Cyc Unit, Bronx Cyc Unit, and Kings Borough Cyc Center. The court granted Leggett 60 days to file an amended complaint identifying the people allegedly involved, describing what each person did or failed to do, stating when and where events occurred, describing his injuries, and specifying the relief sought. The amended complaint must replace the original complaint rather than supplement it. No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that failure to amend within the allowed period, absent good cause, would result in dismissal for failure to state a claim. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 18-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.