Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 10, 2023

Hussey v. Nurse Luboa

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-04371
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Hussey v. Nurse Luboa, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate civil-rights complaint without prejudice to Hussey’s pending case.

Who this affects

Yessuh Suhyes Hussey, Nurse Luboa, Dr. Schneider, and the pending related case identified by docket number 23-CV-2907 (LTS).

What happened

In Hussey v. Nurse Luboa, Yessuh Suhyes Hussey brought a self-represented civil-rights case under Section 1983 against Nurse Luboa and Dr. Schneider.

The court said Hussey had already filed a substantially similar case involving the same facts and claims against Luboa, which remained pending under docket number 23-CV-2907 (LTS). The court also noted that the earlier case included allegations against Schneider, although Schneider was not named as a defendant there.

The court dismissed this complaint without prejudice to Hussey’s pending case, directed the Clerk of Court not to charge the filing fee, and denied fee-free status for an appeal. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also directed that judgment be entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hussey v. Nurse Luboa · No. 1:23-cv-04371
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 10, 2023

Background

Yessuh Suhyes Hussey, who was detained at the Eric M. Taylor Center on Rikers Island, filed this self-represented action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint named Nurse Luboa and Dr. Schneider as defendants.

The court stated that Hussey had previously submitted a substantially similar complaint against Luboa, arising from the same set of facts. That earlier case was pending under docket number 23-CV-2907 (LTS). The court’s earlier order had dismissed that complaint but allowed Hussey 60 days to file an amended complaint. The court also noted that Hussey had included allegations concerning Schneider in the earlier case but had not named Schneider as a defendant, and had been instructed to include any plausible Section 1983 claims against Schneider in the amended complaint in that case.

Ruling

The court dismissed this complaint as duplicative of docket number 23-CV-2907 (LTS), stating that filing and litigating a duplicate lawsuit would serve no useful purpose. The dismissal was without prejudice to Hussey’s pending case.

The court directed the Clerk of Court not to charge Hussey the $350 filing fee for this action and directed that funds not be deducted or encumbered from his prison trust account for this lawsuit. The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.