Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2024

Harriram v. Fera

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-03696
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Motion to DismissCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Harriram v. Fera, Judge Abrams granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in full and dismissed Harriram’s claims with prejudice.

Who this affects

Priya Harriram and the defendants Joseph L. Fera, Brian Wynne, Dawn Ewing-Morgan, Bridget Barbera, the City University of New York, and Lehman College; the case was closed.

What happened

In Harriram v. Fera, the defendants asked the court to dismiss Priya Harriram’s claims. The judgment does not describe the underlying claims or the defendants’ specific arguments.

The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in full. It said Harriram had received three opportunities to amend her pleadings, including one additional opportunity after a March 2023 ruling, but had not corrected the identified problems.

Judge Ronnie Abrams dismissed Harriram’s claims with prejudice, meaning the claims cannot be brought again in this case. The case was closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Harriram v. Fera · No. 1:21-cv-03696
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Mar. 8, 2024

Background

Priya Harriram sued Joseph L. Fera, Brian Wynne, Dawn Ewing-Morgan, Bridget Barbera, the City University of New York, and Lehman College. The judgment does not state the legal claims or provide the factual background.

Ruling

The defendants moved to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss in full. The court stated that Harriram had been given three opportunities to amend her pleadings, including “one more opportunity to amend the Complaint” after the court’s March 2023 opinion. The court concluded that she had failed to correct the deficiencies through the amendments previously allowed.

Disposition

The court dismissed Harriram’s claims with prejudice, meaning the claims cannot be refiled in this case, and stated that the case was closed. Judge Ronnie Abrams is identified in the supplied case information; the judgment itself is signed by the clerk of court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.