Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Apr. 26, 2024

Arias v. A & J Deli Fish Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:19-cv-04042
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
EmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Arias v. A&J Deli Fish Corp., Judge Carter adopted a wage-damages recommendation totaling $174,646, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

Who this affects

Manuel Arias and Daniel Mejia, and defendants A&J Deli Fish Corp. d/b/a Aurora Fish Grill and Julio Castillo.

What happened

In Arias v. A&J Deli Fish Corp., Manuel Arias and Daniel Mejia sought relief from A&J Deli Fish Corp., doing business as Aurora Fish Grill, and Julio Castillo, for unpaid minimum and overtime wages and related amounts.

A magistrate judge recommended $174,646 in damages: unpaid minimum and overtime wages, matching liquidated damages, and spread-of-hours pay and matching liquidated damages for Arias. The recommendation also included interest before judgment, $34,470 in attorneys’ fees, and $400 in costs.

No party objected. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. found no clear error in the recommendation, adopted it, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Arias v. A & J Deli Fish Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-04042
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Apr. 26, 2024

Background

Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses issued a Report and Recommendation on December 14, 2023. It recommended that plaintiffs Manuel Arias and Daniel Mejia receive damages from defendants A&J Deli Fish Corp. d/b/a Aurora Fish Grill and Julio Castillo for unpaid minimum and overtime wages, statutory penalties, and related relief. The plaintiffs later filed a letter-motion asking the District Court to adopt the recommendation. No objections were filed.

Recommended Monetary Relief

The recommendation called for an aggregate $174,646 in damages, consisting of:

- $86,099 in unpaid minimum and overtime wages: $72,582 for Arias and $13,517 for Mejia; - $86,099 in liquidated damages for those unpaid wages, in the same amounts for each plaintiff; - $1,224 in unpaid spread-of-hours pay for Arias; and - $1,224 in liquidated damages for Arias’s unpaid spread-of-hours pay.

It also recommended prejudgment interest, meaning interest accruing before judgment, at $18.20 per day for Arias from December 13, 2016, until judgment was entered, and at $3.33 per day for Mejia from October 23, 2017, until judgment was entered. The recommendation included $34,470 in attorneys’ fees and $400 in costs.

Court’s Review and Ruling

When no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the District Court reviews the record for clear error. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. reviewed the recommendation’s discussion of the law and the record and concluded that there was no clear error. The court adopted Magistrate Judge Moses’s Report and Recommendation and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.