Arias v. A & J Deli Fish Corp.
- Andrew Carter
- 1:19-cv-04042
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Arias v. A&J Deli Fish Corp., Judge Carter adopted a wage-damages recommendation totaling $174,646, plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.
Manuel Arias and Daniel Mejia, and defendants A&J Deli Fish Corp. d/b/a Aurora Fish Grill and Julio Castillo.
What happened
In Arias v. A&J Deli Fish Corp., Manuel Arias and Daniel Mejia sought relief from A&J Deli Fish Corp., doing business as Aurora Fish Grill, and Julio Castillo, for unpaid minimum and overtime wages and related amounts.
A magistrate judge recommended $174,646 in damages: unpaid minimum and overtime wages, matching liquidated damages, and spread-of-hours pay and matching liquidated damages for Arias. The recommendation also included interest before judgment, $34,470 in attorneys’ fees, and $400 in costs.
No party objected. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. found no clear error in the recommendation, adopted it, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
The detailed version
- Arias v. A & J Deli Fish Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-04042
- Andrew Carter
- Apr. 26, 2024
Background
Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses issued a Report and Recommendation on December 14, 2023. It recommended that plaintiffs Manuel Arias and Daniel Mejia receive damages from defendants A&J Deli Fish Corp. d/b/a Aurora Fish Grill and Julio Castillo for unpaid minimum and overtime wages, statutory penalties, and related relief. The plaintiffs later filed a letter-motion asking the District Court to adopt the recommendation. No objections were filed.
Recommended Monetary Relief
The recommendation called for an aggregate $174,646 in damages, consisting of:
- $86,099 in unpaid minimum and overtime wages: $72,582 for Arias and $13,517 for Mejia; - $86,099 in liquidated damages for those unpaid wages, in the same amounts for each plaintiff; - $1,224 in unpaid spread-of-hours pay for Arias; and - $1,224 in liquidated damages for Arias’s unpaid spread-of-hours pay.
It also recommended prejudgment interest, meaning interest accruing before judgment, at $18.20 per day for Arias from December 13, 2016, until judgment was entered, and at $3.33 per day for Mejia from October 23, 2017, until judgment was entered. The recommendation included $34,470 in attorneys’ fees and $400 in costs.
Court’s Review and Ruling
When no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the District Court reviews the record for clear error. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. reviewed the recommendation’s discussion of the law and the record and concluded that there was no clear error. The court adopted Magistrate Judge Moses’s Report and Recommendation and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.