Martinez v. Parkash 2125 LLC
Rolando Lopez Martinez, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated v. Parkash 2125 LLC, Anurag Parkash, and Ved Parkash
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:23-cv-05097
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Lopez Martinez v. Parkash 2125 LLC, Judge Ramos directed the parties to submit their agreement for court approval by September 16, 2025.
The named plaintiff and the three defendants are directly affected by the submission deadline. The caption also refers to other persons similarly situated, but the opinion does not explain their status or whether a class was certified.
What happened
In Rolando Lopez Martinez v. Parkash 2125 LLC, Anurag Parkash, and Ved Parkash, the court said the parties had reached an agreement on all issues. The order does not describe the claims or the agreement’s terms.
The court directed the parties to submit their agreement for approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a cited decision, by September 16, 2025.
Judge Edgardo Ramos issued the order on September 2, 2025. The order directs submission of the agreement but does not state that the court approved or rejected it.
The detailed version
- Martinez v. Parkash 2125 LLC · No. 1:23-cv-05097
- Edgardo Ramos
- Sept. 2, 2025
Background
The court was advised that Rolando Lopez Martinez and the defendants—Parkash 2125 LLC, Anurag Parkash, and Ved Parkash—had reached an agreement on all issues. The opinion does not identify the claims, describe the agreement’s terms, or state whether any class was certified.
Order
The court directed the parties to submit their agreement for approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), by September 16, 2025. This order set a submission deadline; it did not state that the court approved or rejected the agreement.
Effect
The order requires the parties to submit their agreement for court approval. It does not state a final disposition of the case or explain what happens after submission.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.