Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 11, 2025

Balderramo v. Go New York Tours Inc.

Full caption

Victor H. Alvarado Balderramo, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, et al. v. Go New York Tours Inc., and Asen Kostadinov, jointly and severally

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:15-cv-02326
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Alvarado Balderramo v. Go New York Tours, Judge Ramos ordered the parties to appear for a conference after reporting continued efforts to finalize a class settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, Go New York Tours Inc., and Asen Kostadinov, who were directed to appear for the scheduled conference.

What happened

Victor H. Alvarado Balderramo brought a proposed class action against Go New York Tours Inc. and Asen Kostadinov under federal and New York wage laws. The case had previously involved cross-motions for summary judgment.

The parties told the court several times between 2023 and 2025 that they were working toward a class-action settlement and expected to seek court approval. The opinion states that no further activity had occurred since their July 18, 2025 status letter.

Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the parties to appear for a conference on October 8, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 619 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York. This order did not approve or reject a settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Balderramo v. Go New York Tours Inc. · No. 1:15-cv-02326
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Sept. 11, 2025

Background

Victor H. Alvarado Balderramo filed a proposed class action on March 27, 2015, against Go New York Tours Inc. and Asen Kostadinov. The claims were brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Labor Law, the Minimum Wage Act, and the Wage Theft Protection Act. The opinion states that Kostadinov was Go New York Tours Inc.'s president and owner.

Procedural history

The court states that an earlier opinion in this action granted in part and denied in part the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. On April 10, 2023, the parties reported that they were engaged in private mediation. They later reported that they were preparing a settlement agreement and expected to seek preliminary approval of a class-action settlement under Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They also stated that they would seek approval under the procedure discussed in Cheeks together with a motion for final approval of the class settlement.

The court requested additional status reports in July 2024 and April, July, and July 2025. In the July 18, 2025 status report, the parties again said they were still finalizing a class-action settlement. The opinion states that there had been no activity in the case since then.

Order

Judge Edgardo Ramos directed the parties to appear for a conference on October 8, 2025, at 11:30 a.m. The conference was set for Courtroom 619 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007. The order did not rule on whether to approve the reported settlement and did not resolve the underlying wage claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.