Quizhpi v. Spa Management Service Inc.
Elba Gladys Paca QuizhpHi and Delia Sara Paca QuizhpI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Spa Management Service Inc., 243 Willis Nails Inc., Son Dinh Tran, and Anh Diep Do
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:23-cv-00906
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Paca Quizhphi v. Spa Management Service, Judge Ramos ordered the parties to submit their overdue settlement agreement for review by October 17, 2025.
The plaintiffs and defendants in the case, including the proposed group of similarly situated plaintiffs, were affected by the new deadline for submitting the settlement agreement.
What happened
Elba Gladys Paca Quizhphi and Delia Sara Paca Quizhpi sued Spa Management Service Inc., 243 Willis Nails Inc., Son Dinh Tran, and Anh Diep Do. The parties asked for more time to submit their settlement agreement for court review.
The court had already granted one earlier extension and granted a second extension on September 10, 2025, setting an October 8 deadline. The parties did not meet that deadline.
The court directed the parties again to submit the settlement agreement by October 17, 2025. Judge Edgardo Ramos issued the order on October 10, 2025.
The detailed version
- Quizhpi v. Spa Management Service Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-00906
- Edgardo Ramos
- Oct. 10, 2025
Background
The parties requested additional time to submit their settlement agreement for court review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The court had granted an earlier extension and then granted the parties’ request on September 10, 2025, extending the deadline to October 8, 2025.
What happened
The parties did not submit the settlement agreement by the October 8 deadline. The opinion states that this was the second extension the court had granted.
Ruling
The court directed the parties again to submit their settlement agreement for court review by October 17, 2025. The order does not state whether the court approved, rejected, or otherwise evaluated the settlement agreement’s terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.