Harvey Del Valle and Schenelle Sam v. Tapestry
Harvey Del Valle and Schenelle Sam, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated v. Tapestry, Inc.
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:25-cv-01715
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Del Valle and Sam v. Tapestry, Judge Ramos directed the parties to submit their reported settlement for court review.
The named plaintiffs, Harvey Del Valle and Schenelle Sam, Tapestry, Inc., and the others whom the plaintiffs identify as similarly situated.
What happened
In Harvey Del Valle and Schenelle Sam v. Tapestry, Inc., the parties told the court that they had settled all issues, so court-ordered mediation did not occur.
The court directed the parties to submit their settlement agreement for review by October 22, 2025. The order does not say that the court approved the settlement.
Judge Edgardo Ramos issued the order on October 8, 2025, requiring court review under the cited Second Circuit decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
The detailed version
- Harvey Del Valle and Schenelle Sam v. Tapestry · No. 1:25-cv-01715
- Edgardo Ramos
- Oct. 8, 2025
Background
The court said it was informed on October 7, 2025, that court-ordered mediation had not been held because the parties represented that they had reached a settlement on all issues.
Order
The court directed the parties to submit their settlement agreement for court review by October 22, 2025. It cited Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The order does not state whether the settlement was approved.
Effect
The order requires the parties to provide the settlement agreement for review. It does not describe the underlying claims or make a ruling on them. Judge Edgardo Ramos signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.