Johnson v. City of New York
- George Daniels
- 1:19-cv-08745
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 15
In Michael A. Johnson II v. New York State Governor Office, Judge McMahon dismissed two defendants, replaced the NYPD, and allowed amendment.
Michael A. Johnson II’s claims against Governor Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio were dismissed; the NYPD was replaced by the City of New York, and Johnson was allowed to amend his complaint against the City and unidentified individual officers.
What happened
In Michael A. Johnson II v. New York State Governor Office, Michael A. Johnson II alleged that police officers assaulted him and his service dog, falsely arrested him, took $500, denied him medical care, and committed hate crimes. He also alleged that Governor Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio failed to intervene.
The court dismissed the claims against Governor Cuomo because state immunity barred the damages claims, and dismissed the claims against Mayor de Blasio because the complaint did not show his personal involvement. The court replaced the NYPD with the City of New York as a defendant and allowed Johnson to file an amended complaint naming individual officers and explaining the facts supporting his claims.
Judge Colleen McMahon gave Johnson 60 days to file the amended complaint and said it would replace the original complaint. The court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Johnson v. City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-08745
- George Daniels
- Nov. 5, 2019
Background
Michael A. Johnson II proceeded without a lawyer and without prepaying filing fees. He brought the action under the federal-question statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, alleging violations of his rights by Governor Andrew Cuomo, Mayor Bill de Blasio, and the New York City Police Department (NYPD).
Johnson attached a notice of claim rather than providing factual information on the court’s complaint form. He alleged that NYPD officers assaulted him and his service dog, falsely arrested him, took $500 without giving him a receipt, committed hate crimes, denied him medical care, and used excessive force. He identified events on January 7, 2019, at the 40th Precinct in the Bronx, and on March 27, 2019, at an undisclosed location. He also referred to other alleged assaults between January 23, 2016, and September 11, 2019, and to an earlier related proceeding involving false arrest, malicious prosecution, and deprivation of his dog.
Court’s analysis
Because Johnson was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court screened the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). That statute requires dismissal of claims that are frivolous, malicious, inadequately pleaded, or seek money from an immune defendant. The court also explained that a complaint must provide enough factual detail to make a claim plausible and must comply with the requirement of a short and plain statement of the facts.
Governor Cuomo. The court treated Johnson’s claims against Governor Cuomo as claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the federal civil-rights statute that allows claims for violations of federal rights by state actors. It dismissed those claims under Eleventh Amendment immunity, which generally protects states and state agents from suits in federal court. The court stated that Congress had not removed New York’s immunity for § 1983 claims and that New York had not waived the immunity.
Mayor de Blasio. The court dismissed the claims against Mayor de Blasio for failure to state a claim. It explained that a person generally cannot be held liable under § 1983 merely because that person supervises or employs someone who allegedly violated the plaintiff’s rights. Johnson did not allege facts showing the mayor’s direct and personal involvement in the events.
NYPD and the City of New York. The court stated that the NYPD, as a City agency, was not an entity that could be sued. Because Johnson was representing himself and appeared to intend to assert claims against the City, the court directed the Clerk to replace the NYPD with the City of New York in the caption. The court stated that this amendment was without prejudice to defenses the City might assert.
The court explained that a municipality is not liable under § 1983 merely because one of its employees allegedly acted wrongfully. Johnson needed to allege facts showing that a City policy, custom, or practice caused the constitutional violation. Because he had not done so, the court granted him leave to provide facts supporting municipal liability.
Individual officers and leave to amend
Johnson alleged wrongdoing by individual NYPD officers but did not identify those officers. The court granted him leave to name the officers and explain how and when each officer allegedly violated his rights. The amended complaint had to identify the relevant people, describe what each defendant did or failed to do, provide dates and locations, explain the alleged rights violations and injuries, and state the relief sought.
Disposition
The court dismissed Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio from the action, replaced the NYPD with the City of New York, and granted Johnson leave to file an amended complaint within 60 days. The amended complaint would completely replace the original complaint, so any facts or claims Johnson wished to maintain had to be included in it. The court stated that failure to comply could result in dismissal for failure to state a claim. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.
Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order.
Read the full 15-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.