Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2022

Naranjo v. The Classic of NY Nails & Spa Inc.

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:21-cv-01731
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Naranjo v. The Classic of NY Nails & Spa, Judge Netburn approved the parties’ fair FLSA settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.

Who this affects

The parties to the action: Dolores Naranjo and the other plaintiffs, and The Classic of NY Nails & Spa, Inc. and the other defendants listed in the caption.

What happened

Naranjo v. The Classic of NY Nails & Spa, Inc. is a Fair Labor Standards Act case in which the parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted a proposed settlement for court review.

The court reviewed the proposed settlement and determined that it was fair and reasonable. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

Judge Sarah Netburn approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the case was ended and could not be refiled.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Naranjo v. The Classic of NY Nails & Spa Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-01731
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Jan. 31, 2022

Background

The case was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted a proposed settlement to the court on January 28, 2022, for review.

Court’s Analysis

The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the required settlement-review process cited in the opinion. It determined that the settlement was fair and reasonable. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or other terms.

Disposition

The settlement was APPROVED, and the action was DISMISSED with prejudice. The order was issued by Sarah Netburn, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 31, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.