Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 20, 2023

Diaz v. Parkash 1630 LLC

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:21-cv-08382
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Diaz v. Parkash 1630 LLC, Judge Netburn approved the parties’ fair and reasonable settlement and dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case with prejudice.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case. The action was dismissed with prejudice after the court approved their settlement.

What happened

Diaz v. Parkash 1630 LLC is a Fair Labor Standards Act case. The parties attended a settlement conference on July 20, 2023, and reached an agreement in principle.

On October 17, 2023, they submitted a proposed settlement for the court’s review. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or the underlying claims.

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable, approved it, and dismissed the action with prejudice. Judge Sarah Netburn issued the order on October 20, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Diaz v. Parkash 1630 LLC · No. 1:21-cv-08382
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
Oct. 20, 2023

Background

This Fair Labor Standards Act case involved Delfino Adan Diaz as the plaintiff and Parkash 1630 LLC and other defendants. The parties appeared for a settlement conference on July 20, 2023, and reached an agreement in principle.

Settlement Review

On October 17, 2023, the parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement for the court’s review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, a Second Circuit decision requiring review of certain Fair Labor Standards Act settlements.

Ruling

After reviewing the proposed agreement, the court determined that it was fair and reasonable. The court approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the action was ended and could not be refiled. Judge Sarah Netburn signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.