Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc.
- Sarah Netburn
- 1:22-cv-04695
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc., Judge Netburn ordered the parties to file their settlement agreement for review after reaching a settlement in principle.
Oscar Ormello and A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc., et al., the parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case.
What happened
In Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc., the parties appeared at a settlement conference in this Fair Labor Standards Act case on July 25, 2023, and agreed to settlement terms in principle.
The court instructed the parties to submit their signed settlement agreement for review by August 24, 2023. The agreement was to be filed publicly unless a party could show a legal basis for keeping it sealed.
Judge Sarah Netburn issued the order. The order did not state the settlement’s terms or approve the settlement; it directed the parties to submit the executed agreement for the court’s review.
The detailed version
- Ormello v. A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-04695
- Sarah Netburn
- July 25, 2023
Background
This Fair Labor Standards Act case involved Oscar Ormello as plaintiff and A. Biancardi & Sons, Inc., et al., as defendants. The parties appeared before the court for a settlement conference on July 25, 2023, and agreed to the terms of a settlement in principle.
Order
The court instructed the parties to submit their executed settlement agreement for the court’s review no later than August 24, 2023. The agreement was to be filed publicly on the court’s electronic filing system unless a party established a basis for sealing it under the standard described in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
Disposition
Judge Sarah Netburn ordered the parties to submit the executed settlement agreement for review. The opinion does not disclose the settlement terms and does not state that the court approved the settlement. This was a settlement-related procedural order, not a ruling on the underlying Fair Labor Standards Act claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.